A Green Chemistry Module 
Suggested
Use:An advanced organic chemistry course during a discussion of nucleophilic
substitution reactions or aromatic substitution reactions.
Nucleophilic
Aromatic Substitution: Some new green chemistry
for an old reaction
dickneidert1@scranton.edu
Introduction
Substituted benzene molecules have tremendous importance
in industrial chemical applications. They are commonly used as solvents
and they are often important intermediates in many syntheses, including
those of powerful pharmaceutical agents.One class of compounds produced
in this way serves as intermediates in the synthesis of antidegradants
compounds that are very important in the chemical rubber industry.This
module deals with a recently developed method for the production of one
of these intermediates, 4-aminodiphenylamine (4-ADPA). The chemistry presented
exemplifies an innovative approach to the problem of introducing nucleophiles
onto aromatic ring systems in a way that greatly reduces the negative environmental
problems associated with the more well known synthetic procedures.
The most common method of producing substituted
benzene rings involves the well-known reaction of electrophilic aromatic
substitution (EAS).This allows facile substitution for hydrogen of nitro
groups, halogens, sulfonic acid, alkyl and acyl groups.While the applications
of this reaction for multiple substitutions are limited by the ortho/para
or meta directing properties of groups on the ring as well as their activating/deactivating
properties, it is usually possible to prepare the desired compound as long
as the group to be introduced to the ring is an electrophile.This
means that a whole family of substituents, which are nucleophilic in nature,
cannot be introduced to the ring by EAS. In general, reactions involving
the substitution of nucleophiles are difficult. Under the usual conditions
for nucleophilic substitution reactions they produce vanishingly small
amounts of product.Recalling the two mechanisms for nucleophilic substitution,
SN1 and SN2 demonstrates the reason: with an aromatic
ring there is no available backside approach to the carbon, hydrogen is
a very poor leaving group, and the aromatic system will not readily ionize
by loss of hydrogen.Therefore, in order to introduce important nucleophiles
onto the aromatic ring some tricks have to played on the ring itself. Under
the special conditions which then result it is possible to incorporate
nucleophiles onto the ring. It is this reaction, Nucleophilic Aromatic
Substitution (NAS) that is the topic of this module.We will examine
the traditional chemistry for NAS along with the elucidated mechanisms.In
doing this we will see that this chemistry has several environmental problems
that make it undesirable as a large scale industrial process.In response
to these problems Flexsys America L.P. (1) developed a method
for eliminating these problems in the production of the industrially important
intermediate, 4-aminodiphenylamine. In recognition of their work they were
awarded a Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award.We will examine
the mechanism and the conditions for this reaction and speculate on its
adaptability to further syntheses.
The Mechanisms
There are at least four mechanisms (2),
operating under different conditions, for the introduction of a nucleophile
onto an aromatic ring.They are the SNAr, Benzyne,
SN1,
and SNR1 mechanism.Although these four have been identified
and studied most nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions which are
commonly performed are accomplished by either the SNAr or Benzyne
mechanisms so we will concentrate on those and only briefly consider the
other two.
SNAr mechanism [addition/elimination]
This is the most important of the mechanisms for
nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions. The experimental evidence
indicates that there are two steps and so it is often referred to as the
addition/elimination
mechanism. The reaction begins with attack by the nucleophile
on the ring carbon bearing the leaving group. This is the addition
step of the reaction. This produces an anionic intermediate.
This ion, known as the Meisenheimer
complex, is resonance stabilized.
In the second step of the reaction the elimination occurs
as the ring undergoes rearomatization with the loss of the Leaving
Group. The first step, in which the ring loses it aromatic stabilization
and the anion is produced is the slow or Rate
Determining Step (RDS).
However, the reaction as shown above would not proceed
to yield product!Resonance stabilization alone is not sufficient for the
anionic intermediate to form. It must be stabilized by strong electron-withdrawing
groups in positions ortho and/or para to the leaving group.
The most important electron-withdrawing
group(G)
for these reactions is the Nitro group (-NO2). It will activate
the ring for NAS reaction with strong nucleophiles at moderate temperatures
(80-100oC). There are several other Groups that will activate
the ring for room temperature reaction with strong nucleophiles when the
nitro group is present in either the ortho or para position.
Mechanisms are, of course, based on experimental
evidence. There are several important observations and results that support
the SNAr mechanism.The most important of these is the isolation
of the intermediate, surely the most persuasive pieces of evidence for
any mechanism!
The reaction shown below produces a stable salt
which has been isolated and characterized. It was first isolated in 1902
by Jacob Meisenheimer (3) who proposed the correct structure
which was later confirmed by NMR studies.

Further support for the SNAr mechanism
comes from the fact that the nature of the Leaving Group has little effect
on the course of the reaction.Like all anionic leaving groups, the LG in
the NAS reaction leaves with a pair of electrons so it must be a species
that is able to bear a negative charge.However, since only small effects
are seen upon varying the LG in comparing species which form stable anions,
it would indicate that the bond to the Leaving Group is not broken in the
rate determining step of the reaction. This supports the two step nature
of the SNAr mechanism.For the halogens, which are the most common
leaving groups in NAS, their reactivity parallels their electronegativity
( F>>Cl, Br, I) since the more
electronegative the atom, the more electron density it withdraws from the
carbon. The more positive the carbon, the faster the attack by the nucleophile
will be.
This reaction has found great synthetic utility, however,
it produces a product with the necessary activating electron-withdrawing
groups attached to the ring! When the NAS reaction is part of a multistep
synthetic scheme, that may or may not be desirable.Therefore, NAS reactions
based on this one mechanism alone will not allow synthesis of all desired
products.
The Benzyne Mechanism [elimination/addition]
It is possible for a benzene ring bearing a good
leaving group to undergo Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution without strongly
electron-withdrawing groups substituted in the ortho/para position(s).For
this to happen the aromatic substrate must be treated with a base strong
enough to abstract a proton.When the Base/Nucleophile abstracts the hydrogen,
the sigma electrons bonding the hydrogen to the carbon are then contributed
to the carbon bearing the leaving group, causing the departure of the leaving
group. This produces a unique intermediate, BENZYNE. This
intermediate then reacts with the conjugate acid of the Base/Nucleophile,
which adds the nucleophile and returns the ring to its original aromatic
state.
The overall result is that in this reaction the
order of the processes is reversed compared to the SNAr mechanism;
the benzene substrate undergoes an elimination reaction – loss of hydrogen
and LG- followed by an addition of the nucleophile.
There is strong experimental support for the Benzyne
Mechanism.The first piece of evidence rests on leaving group ability.For
the halogens, again the most important leaving group, the order(Br > I
> Cl >> F) deviates significantly from that seen in the SNAr
mechanism. (4) This indicates that a different mechanism is
operating.
The identity of the leaving group also affects which
step is rate determining, another piece of supporting evidence.To understand
this requires a closer look at the Elimination step of this mechanism.
This step may be concerted (as implied above) or it may be stepwise (see
below).
If the elimination is stepwise, when the LG is Br
or I the first step, the loss of hydrogen, is the RDS. However, when the
LG is Cl or F, the loss of the LG is rate determining.
Another important clue to the nature of this reaction
is given by the fact that in substrates where there are substituent groups
in both ortho positions to the Leaving Group there is no reaction, since
the Benzyne intermediate could not form. (4)
Studies of reaction mechanisms often benefit from
the use of substrates labeled with radioisotopes. An interesting study
of this mechanism was performed using a 14C labeled compound.
(5)
The most convincing evidence for this mechanism,
however, might be that associated with the Benzyne
intermediate itself. While it has never been isolated under experimental
conditions it has been studied in argon at 8 K and its spectrum has been
recorded during the progress of reactions. (6)
The available electron density of the “triple bond”
makes it a pseudo-dienophile in a Diels-Alder reaction.When Benzyne
in generated following diazotination of anthranilic acid in the presence
of a Diene, such as furan, a Diels/Alder adduct is recovered from the reaction
mixture.(7)
This trapping of the intermediate Benzyneis
strong evidence supporting its existence.
Other Mechanisms
There are two other mechanisms possible for nucleophilic
aromatic substitution. They each deal with specialized substrates and therefore,
are not common routes to aromatic rings substituted with nucleophilic species.
Therefore, we will examine them only briefly, concentrating on the reaction
and some evidence for each route proposed.
SN1 Mechanism
This is a common mechanism for substitution of nucleophiles
for diazonium salts.In this case the leaving group is not a halide or sulfonate,
as in most NAS reactions, but rather the nitrogen molecule lost from the
diazonium salt.
The most important evidence for this reaction mechanism
comes from kinetic studies that indicate that the reaction is first order
in diazonium salt, so the slow step of the reaction is the decomposition
of the salt.Since the nucleophile is not involved in the RDS, the reaction
is actually an SN1 reaction for aromatic substitution.
SNR1 Mechanism
There is experimental evidence that indicates that
certain aromatic substrates, particularly iodobenzenes, undergo nucleophilic
substitution reactions by a free radical mechanism. The proposed mechanism
for this reaction begins with an initiation step in which an electron is
transferred to the aromatic substrate from an electron donor, forming a
radical anion. This species loses iodide in the first propagation step
to give an aryl radical. The nucleophile reacts with the aryl radical to
give another radical anion in the second chain propagation step. In the
third step of the chain this radical loses an electron to another molecule
of substrate producing the nucleophilic substitution product and another
radicalanion, thus establishing the chain that is characteristic of free
radical reactions. The chain propagation steps are followed by several
types of termination steps, including combinations of radicals formed in
the propagating steps or the reaction of the aromatic radical with a hydrogen
donor to produce benzene.

One of the most important pieces of experimental
evidence for this mechanism is the fact that no reaction takes place when
radical scavengers are introduced into the reaction mixture.Also, this
mechanism explains observed substitution patterns of nucleophilic aromatic
substitution reactions that are inconsistent with expectations from either
the SNAr or Benzyne mechanisms. An example of these results
is shown below for the reactions of a 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene substituted
in the 5 and 6 positions.(8)When the substituent was chlorine
or bromine the NAS product was the expected 5 and 6-substituted product
in roughly equal amounts. These would, of course, be the expected results
from the Benzyne mechanism since either product would be equally likely
from the Benzyne intermediate.However, when the trimethyl benzene was substituted
with iodine ins the 5 and 6 positions, products with the nucleophile in
the 5 and 6 positions were not obtained in equal amounts indicating that
another mechanisms was operating with the iodobenzene substrate.

The SNR1 mechanism has been found to
be very versatile since no activating groups are needed as substituents
on the ring for reaction to take place. The reaction can be initiated electrochemically
or photolytically and substrates containing the other halogens as well
as a quaternary methyl amine will also undergo reaction by the free radical
mechanism in the presence of an electron donor to initiate the reaction.
Green
Chemistry - An alternative synthetic pathway for
Aromatic
Nucleophilic Substitution
Green
Chemistry Challenge Award -Elimination of Chlorine
in the Synthesis of 4-Aminodiphenylamine: A New Process Which Utilizes
Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution for Hydrogen
Introduction

The
chemical rubber industry uses several classes of compounds as antidegradants.
They are antioxidants and antiozonants.These compounds serve an important
purpose because they protect the rubbers, natural or synthetic, from the
harmful effects of exposure to the atmosphere and sunlight.The types of
organic compounds used as antidegradants are shown to the left.The antioxidants
slow the oxidation of the rubber. They react with hydroperoxides and produce
compounds which do not react with the rubber. Since it is thought that
rubber cracks as a result of an oxidative process which hastens any mechanical
cracking, they also serve an antiflex purpose and keep the rubber from
cracking. Some are also classified as antifatigue agents. The antiozonants
are used in combination with unsaturated rubbers to prevent reaction with
ozone from the atmosphere which causes surface cracking in the rubber compound.While
the mechanism for the action of the antiozonants is not well understood,
they apparently function by coating the rubber surface. One of the most
important intermediates in the synthesis of these antidegradants is 4-aminodiphenylamine
(4-ADPA).
The Existing Industrial Method
The current industrial preparation of 4-ADPA uses
a two electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions in order to prepare
the ring for nucleophilic aromatic substitution. The first, chlorination
of benzene provides the leaving group. The second, nitration of the chlorobenzene,
serves to activate the molecule for nucleophilic aromatic substitution
reaction needed to add formanilide to the substrate. Hydrogenation of the
resulting diphenyl nitrate compound yields the desired 4-aminodiphenylamine.
The sequence begins with a well-known electrophilic
aromatic substitution (EAS) reaction in which the chlorine atom is substituted
for hydrogen on the benzene nucleus.Another EAS reaction nitrates the compound
in the ortho and para positions. This regioselectivity results from the
directing nature of the chlorine present on the substrate.It is electron
donating by resonance which stabilizes the transition state species leading
to the intermediate benzenonium ion for the ortho and para products. Recall,
that although the halogens are electron releasing through resonance, they
are electron-withdrawing by induction and the inductive effect is stronger
than the resonance effect. Therefore, this reaction would proceed at a
slower rate than nitration of unsubstituted benzene. These EAS reactions
are shown below.

The para-nitrochlorobenzene (PNCB)
produced in the EAS reaction is the substrate for the nucleophilic aromatic
substitution reaction. This reaction proceeds according to the SNArmechanism
we have discussed above.In this case the lone pair electrons on the nitrogen
of the formanilide act as the nucleophilic electron density.The product
of the first step of the sequence is 4-nitrodiphenylamine (4-NDPA).
A catalytic hydrogenation yields the synthetic goal, 4-ADPA.
The Atom Economy of the Reaction
Chemists have traditionally measured the efficiency
of a reaction by determination of the percentage yield (% yield) of the
reaction. However the % yield deals with only the amount of the desired
product(s) that is isolated (relative to the limiting reagent) and does
not consider the efficiency of the reaction relative to (waste) byproducts
that are formed.The concept of Atom Economy (developed by Barry Trost)
extends the consideration of the efficiency of a reaction to take into
account all the atoms in the reactants and whether these are incorporated
or utilized in the desired product or whether they end up (unutilized)
in byproducts.One can calculate the % Atom Economy determining the mass
of all the atoms that are utilized in the desired product, dividing this
mass by the total mass of all the reactant atoms and multiplying by 100.
For a more complete discussion see the Green Module for Organic Chemistry:
“
ATOM
ECONOMY: A Measure of the Efficiency of a Reaction”
An examination of the reactions above demonstrates
several atom economy problems. The first EAS uses two chlorine atoms, neither
one of which ends up in the product.
The overall reaction scheme for the traditional
preparation of 4-ADPA is shown below. The substrates and reagents are labeled
in red.
The calculation of the Atom
Economy is shown in the table below.
|
Reagent formula
|
Reagent FW
|
Utilized
Atoms
|
Wt
|
Unutilized
Atoms
|
Wt
|
|
1 C6H6
|
78
|
6
C, 4 H
|
76
|
2
H
|
2
|
|
2Cl2
|
70
|
------------
|
0
|
2
Cl
|
70
|
|
3 HNO3
|
63
|
1
N
|
14
|
1
H, 3 O
|
49
|
|
4 C7H7NO
|
121
|
6
C, 6 H, 1 N
|
92
|
1
C, 1 O, 1 H
|
29
|
|
5 K2CO3
|
98
|
------------
|
0
|
2
K, 1 C, 3 O
|
98
|
|
6 H2
|
2
|
2
H
|
2
|
--------------
|
0
|
TOTAL
|
432
|
12C,
12H, 2N
|
161
|
2C,4H,2Cl,2K,7O
|
248
|
The Atom
Economy of the reaction is equal to the weight of utilized
atoms divided by the weight of all reagents used.
%
Atom Economy =161/432 x 100 = 37%
This calculation demonstrates clearly the problems
associated with the current chemistry.
Brown
Chemistryof
the Current Reaction
Besides the unfavorable atom economy and the resulting
environmental as well as economic impact, the reactions currently used
to prepare 4-ADPA present several other environmental concerns. The first
is the % yield of the desired para-nitrochlorobenzene is only 70%
with the other 30% being the unwanted byproduct, ortho-nitrochlorobenzene.
The second is the use of another aromatic hydrocarbon, xylene, as a solvent
for the NAS reaction.This material would have to be properly disposed of
as toxic chemical waste presenting a potential environmental hazard and
adding to the cost of preparing the 4-ADPA.The major concerns about this
reaction pathway, however, center around two aspects. The first, and most
important, is the fact that large amounts of chlorine gas are used in the
first step of the reaction. This gas would have to be stored and handled
properly to minimize the risk of escape to the atmosphere where it would
have severe environmental and health consequences. Also it is a SARA
(Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act) list compound and the amount
of chlorine used and stored must be reported annually to the EPA. Plants
utilizing the SARA materials must also file a hazardous materials plan
demonstrating their planning for dealing with spills and accidents involving
the compound. The second concern is the amounts and variety of wastes produced
in this reaction sequence.The total pathway produces an aqueous solution
of inorganic salts.The problem is that this aqueous waste stream would
be contaminated with the organic materials which are the substrates and
products of the steps in this reaction sequence since they are all polar
enough to have some solubility in water. While it is certainly not impossible
to separate the wastes from this reaction it is time-consuming, expensive,
and presents more risks of contamination of the environment.The nature
of this chemistry is shown in the fact that Monsanto Chemical Company considered
this reaction “one of the most wasteful and potentially dangerous” reactions
that they performed in their various operating plants! (9)
It was clear that the solution was to design a reaction
that could yield the 4-ADPA without using a chlorinated starting material.
The
Green Chemistry Alternative
Development of the Reaction

The
research and development chemists at Monsanto realized that the solution
to these environmental problems involved replacing the traditional NAS
reaction with one that involves substitution for hydrogen, thereby eliminating
the need for the chlorinated substrate.There were several examples of these
nucleophilic aromatic substitution for hydrogen (NASH) reactions known
in the literature. The new chemistry was developed by Flexsys America.
The Alternate Reaction Pathway
The general reaction for a nucleophilic aromatic
substitution for hydrogen reaction is shown below.
The application of this reaction to the synthesis
of 4-ADPA was developed by the work of Sterns, Hileman, and Bashkin.(10)The
new chemistry involves the coupling of aniline and nitrobenzene in a reaction
that is a substitution for hydrogen.This type of reaction was first reported
in the literature in 1903 and proceeded with a 50% yield.
In fact, the NASH reactions in the literature all
suffered from the same limitations.As a group they proceed with very low
yields and show poor selectivities.While the reaction might be feasibly
used to produce compounds in small amounts on a laboratory scale for research
purposes, these drawbacks make the reaction unsuitable for industrial applications
in the preparation of large amounts of material.
The reaction proposed by the Monsanto chemists uses
a base to produce a better nucleophile. The base abstracts a proton from
aniline producing an anilide ion, a much more powerful nucleophile.The
first step of the reaction, then, is a base promoted coupling reaction
in which the anilide ion attacks the carbon para to the activating nitro
group.
As shown below the product of this reaction is then
oxidized under anaerobic conditions to two intermediate products, 4-nitrosodiphenylamine
(4-NODPA) and 4-nitrodiphenylamine (4-NDPA).The first (4-NODPA) is produced
by an intramolecular reaction in which the nitro group of the coupled
product acts as the oxidant.
In the simultaneous intermolecular reaction
(see below) the oxidant is the reactant nitrobenzene. This route yields
the 4-NDPA and azobenzene.The azobenzene produced by this oxidation is
easily recovered and converted back to aniline so it is not a waste product
of the reaction.By optimizing the reaction conditions, the Monsanto chemists
achieved an overall 96% yield of the two intermediate products. In addition,
their increased understanding of the mechanism of the reaction has led
to other applications of nucleophilic aromatic substitution for hydrogen
in which amides are reacted with nitrobenzene producing industrially important
amines.(11)
Atom Economy of the Flexsys NASH Reaction
A similar calculation of the Atom
Economy of the Flexsys NASH reaction is based on the overall reaction
shown below.
Again, the data for the reagents and substrates
labeled in red are shown in the table below.
|
Reagent Formula
|
Reagent FW
|
Utilized
Atoms
|
Wt
|
Unutilized
Atoms
|
Wt
|
|
1 C6H6
|
78
|
6
C, 4 H
|
76
|
2
H
|
2
|
|
2 HNO3
|
63
|
1
N
|
14
|
1
H, 3 O
|
49
|
|
3 C6H7N
|
93
|
6
C, 6 H, N
|
92
|
1
H
|
1
|
|
4 H2
|
2
|
2
H
|
2
|
-----------
|
0
|
TOTAL
|
236
|
12C,12H,2N
|
184
|
4H,3O
|
52
|
The Atom
Economy of the Flexsys NASH reaction is given by
% Atom
Economy =184/236 x 100 = 78%
and represents a two-fold improvement over the traditional
chemistry!
Green
Chemistry of the Flexsys NASH
This alternate reaction sequence has many significant
environmental advantages over the traditional route. The company describes
five important environmental advantages of the new process.(12)
They are:
·Tremendous
reduction of organic waste from the industrial reaction. The Flexsys chemists
report that the new reaction reduces the organic waste by 74% and eliminates
99% of the inorganic waste.In the Green Chemistry Challenge Award Nomination
Flexsys states that if only 30% of the worlds’ supply of 4-ADPA were produced
by NASH there would be a savings of 74 million pounds of waste.
·Reduction
of waste water generated by more than 97%. If the Flexsys chemistry were
used to generate 30% of the annually produced 4-ADPA it would save1.4 billion
pounds of water per year.
·Elimination
of the use of chlorine, a dangerous chemical and a difficult one to handle.
·Elimination
of the use of xylene which is a necessary solvent in the traditional chemistry.Xylene,
an aromatic hydrocarbon, poses its own set of handling, storage and disposal
problems.
·Improved
industrial safety. Compared to the traditional chemistry to produce 4-ADPA,
the new chemistry does not use several process streams and high temperatures,
conditions that can and have led to runaway reactions.Monsanto described
this synthetic process as one of its most dangerous and they report that
they experienced runaway conditions in 1979 which resulted in the explosion
of a reactor. The new chemistry does not show any potential for runaway
conditions.
Study Questions:
1.Draw the structures of the important resonance contributors
for the Meisenheimer complex for the SNAR reaction of the following
substrates.
2. Based on the structures you have drawn in question
1, which compound would you predict to be the best substrate for nucleophilic
aromatic substitution by the SNAr mechanism? Explain your answer
clearly.
3. The Flexsys chemists have extended their NASH chemistry
to the synthesis of amines from the reaction of nitrobenzene with amides.Do
a literature search to find a reference for a reaction of this type. Compare
the proposed mechanism for this reaction to that for the production of
4-ADPA.
4. Draw a Benzyne mechanism for the reaction of both
5-chloro and 6-chloro-1,2,4-trimethylbenzene with amide showing the origin
of the 5 and 6 substituted product from each substrate explaining the observed
product ratio.
5.What experimental means would you use to determine
whether a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction was proceeding by
an SNAR or Benzyne mechanism?
6. Outline a reaction sequence that would convert
azobenzene to aniline.
7. The product of the Flexsys synthesis, 4-ADPA, is
an important intermediate in the synthesis of the antidegradants used in
compounding rubbers. One of these antidegradants which serves as an antiozonant
and antiflex compound is N-isopropyl-N’-phenyl-p-phenylene diamine.
Outline a reasonable synthesis of this compound using 4-ADPA.
Suggestions for Further Study
1. Using a molecular modeling program construct
a model of benzyne showing the location of the p
electron density in the intermediate.
2. The Nanotube Connection, a NASA web site (http://www.ipt.arc.nasa.gov.gallery.html) contains
information on the use of benzyne molecules as gears on machines constructed
from nanotubes.What is a nanotube ? How are they made? What are the possibilities
for machines of the type described on this web site?
References
1.Rains,
Roger K., et al., Elimination of Chlorine in the Synthesis of 4-Aminodiphenylamine:
A New Process Which Utilizes Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution for Hydrogen,
a proposal submitted to the Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards
Program 1998.
2.Comprehensive,
detailed discussions of these mechanisms with extensive references are
found in:
March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, Wiley-Interscience,
NY (1992).
Carroll, F.A. Structure and Mechanism in Organic
Chemistry, Brooks/Cole, NY (1998).
3.Meisenheimer,
J. Liebigs Ann. Chem., 323, 205 (1902).
4.Roberts,
J. D., et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 78, 601 (1956).
5.Roberts,
J. D., op. cit.
6.Chapman,
N. B.. et. al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 98, 6710 (1976).
7.Stiles,
P. J., and Miller, J., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 82, 3802 (1960).
8.March,
op.
cit.
9.Stern,
M.K. et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 114, 9237 (1992).
10.Stern,
M K., et al., New Journ. Chem., 20, 259 (1996).
11.Stern,
M. K. and Cheng, B., J. Org. Chem., 58, 6883 (1993).
12.Rains,
op.
cit.