University of Scranton - Department of Physical Therapy
Edmund M. Kosmahl, PT, EdD
send e-mail to Dr. Kosmahl                    copyright 2000 Edmund M. Kosmahl

Kosmahl EM, Mackarey PJ, Buntz SE: Nautilus training system versus traditional weight training system. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 11:6 pp 253-258, December 1989.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in strength of the dominant quadriceps femoris muscle group among subjects utilizing an Nautilus training system, and a traditional weight system. Method: Eighteen college students, 18-23 years of age, volunteered for this study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group N, Nautilus training system, consisted of six subjects utilizing the Nautilus knee extension machine, performing one set of 15 repetitions to failure, using a 15 repetition maximum (RM) at a count of 5 contract - 1 hold - 5 release. Group T, traditional, consisted of five subjects utilizing an NK table, performing three sets of 10 repetitions at 10 RM following a count of 1 contract - 1 release. Group C, control, consisted of seven subjects who did not undergo any training. The three groups were pre-tested for bilateral quadriceps femoris strength 1 week prior to training, and retested 7 weeks later on the Cybex II Dynamometer. Results: Results of this study, using an ANOVA with F-ratio, demonstrated that the strength gain of the dominant quadriceps femoris muscle was not significantly different between the three groups (p>0.05). However, group T was significantly stronger that group N and Group C in average quadriceps strength (p<0.05). In addition, there was a tendency for group T to demonstrate increased strength gains for all analyses. Conclusion: The authors contend that further investigation must be made to determine whether either method of exercise is superior at increasing quadriceps femoris strength.


If you don't see Dr. K's WebSite Menu, go to Dr. Kosmahl's Home Page