What is your answer?
For Aristotle, brotherhood is an example of:
{ 1 } - an accident of quality.
{ 2 } - a primary substance.
{ 3 } - an accident of state.
{ 4 } - an accident of relation.
{ 5 } - a secondary substance.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
For Aristotle, brotherhood is an example of:
{ 1 } - an accident of quality.
{ 2 } - a primary substance.
{ 3 } - an accident of state.
{ 4 } - an accident of relation.
{ 5 } - a secondary substance.
Brotherhood is not a non-essential characteristic of a subject in himself.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
For Aristotle, brotherhood is an example of:
{ 1 } - an accident of quality.
{ 2 } - a primary substance.
{ 3 } - an accident of state.
{ 4 } - an accident of relation.
{ 5 } - a secondary substance.
Brotherhood is not an individual being, and is present in a subject.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
For Aristotle, brotherhood is an example of:
{ 1 } - an accident of quality.
{ 2 } - a primary substance.
{ 3 } - an accident of state.
{ 4 } - an accident of relation.
{ 5 } - a secondary substance.
Brotherhood is not a non-essential characteristic that an individual has in himself.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
For Aristotle, brotherhood is an example of:
{ 1 } - an accident of quality.
{ 2 } - a primary substance.
{ 3 } - an accident of state.
{ 4 } - an accident of relation.
{ 5 } - a secondary substance.
Brotherhood is a type of connection of one substance to another substance.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
5 is wrong. Please try again.
For Aristotle, brotherhood is an example of:
{ 1 } - an accident of quality.
{ 2 } - a primary substance.
{ 3 } - an accident of state.
{ 4 } - an accident of relation.
{ 5 } - a secondary substance.
Brotherhood is not a definition or part of a definition of an individual, and is thus predicable of a subject.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end