Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. American Psychological Association, 110, 762-784.
Childhood Sexual Abuse (CSA) and
proposed that people who report repressed and recovered CSA memories are prone
to think that experiences like dreams and images are actual events. These people probably have experiences like
nightmares more than average people do, thus confusing reality and
imagination. They also assume they found
a link that the development of false memories of CSA in correlation with having
a deficit in reality monitoring arising from low sensitivity or response
bias. The participants were put into
four different groups, the Continuous memory group, consisting of whom have never
forgotten their CSA. The second group
was the Recovered memory group, those who recovered forgotten memories of
CSA. The third, Repressed memory group,
those who believe they had been sexually abused during childhood and the fourth
group, the Comparison group, consisted of people who reported no CSA. This was used as a control group. All participants were given Vividness of
Visual Imagery Questionnaire, the Dissociative Experiences Scale and the
Absorption Scale. The findings of this study are that
individuals, who experience difficulty discriminating between memories and
fantasies like the repression group, were more likely to score lower than the
continuous group on sensitivity. Unfortunately
the results were not statistically significant for the VVIQ and the DES.
Ghetti, S., Qin, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). False memories in children and adults: Age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience. Developmental Psychology, 38, 705-718.
McNalley, R. J., Clancy, S. A., Barrett, H. M., & Parker, H. A. (2005). Reality monitoring in adults reporting repressed, recovered, or continuous memories of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 147-152.